On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Andreas Metzler wrote: > I do not understand this: > autoconf2.13 2.13-38 (new) (optional) (low) > Maintainer: Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > autoconf2.13 uploaded 15 days ago, out of date by 5 days! > autoconf2.13/alpha: Unsatisfiable Depends: autoconf (>= 2.50) > autoconf2.13/arm: Unsatisfiable Depends: autoconf (>= 2.50) > [etc, for all architectures] > valid candidate (will be installed unless it's dependent upon other > buggy pkgs) > > autoconf 2.52-2 (currently 2.13-27) (optional) (low) > Maintainer: Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > autoconf uploaded 21 days ago, out of date by 11 days! > autoconf/alpha: Unsatisfiable Depends: autoconf2.13 (>= 2.13-34) > autoconf/arm: Unsatisfiable Depends: autoconf2.13 (>= 2.13-34) > [etc, for all architectures] > valid candidate (will be installed unless it's dependent upon > other buggy pkgs)
They depend on eachother. testing scripts don't handle that situation automatically, IIRC -- wouter dot verhelst at advalvas dot be "Human knowledge belongs to the world" -- From the movie "Antitrust" rm -rf /bin/laden
