On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 02:21:15AM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote: > Colin Watson Wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 03:39:15PM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote: > > > I'm the maintainer of gtk+extra (libgtkextra16, libgtkextra-dev) > > > which is quite out of date in testing, and I have no idea why. It > > > has no RC bugs and the dependencies are satisfied. Maybe I'm > > > missing something that someone can clue me into? > > > > update_output.txt says: > > > > gtk+extra: alpha: gpsim gpsim-dev gpsim-lcd gpsim-led gpsim-logic > > quicklist > > > > Perhaps all these packages need to be upgraded in testing > > simultaneously? That needs manual action by the people running testing. > > Hmm, what exactly does that output mean? There are no circular dependencies > as far as I can tell, and everything that depends on it appears to be built > against the correct version. Do I just need to file a bug against > ftp.debian.org - or gpsim?
gpsim and quicklist depend on libgtkextra16, which isn't in testing yet. Upgrading gtk+extra in order to move libgtkextra16 into testing will remove libgtkextra14, which will temporarily break gpsim* and quicklist until they're upgraded too. The testing scripts don't look two moves ahead like that, so the gtk+extra upgrade needs to be forced manually. I've posted to -devel or mailed aj in the past for this sort of thing, although I suspect filing a bug against ftp.debian.org is probably the more correct way to go. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
