Bart Schuller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I've no problem NMU'ing apache, but that might break other packages > > (which?). > > There are two ways to NMU: > > > > 1. leave out expat: this is the simplest way since it only requires a small > > change in the debian/rules file > > > > 2. build with the least version of expat (as described in bug #96093): > > that's > > more work given the way it's currently packaged (the upstream source are > > in tarballs which are unrolled during build) > > I've done 2 privately. It's a bloody shame users have to do this when > the patches are even in the BTS. Maybe we need a group of maintainers to > take over apache.
That might indeed not be a bad idea. I'll post a proposal for this. > Anyway, using 2, apache works, the XML-using perl and php modules work, > and even mod_dav works (the only thing that actually needs expat in the > first place). But does it really need to be in apache for mod_dav? I'll ask the maintainer to check whether it can live without expat in apache. > Oh, and feel free to bounce this to dd if that Reply-To was in error. Done. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo PGP fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
