On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:18:59PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > nfs isn't noted for being fast. > > I agree with most of what you say, but not with this. You can say a lot > about NFS, including that it's bad, insecure, to be thrown away and > changed by CODA or sth else, but not that it's slow. > > I've seen data transfers of ~800KByte/s via NFS. Over my 10MBit coax > network. From a Pentium 166 to a Pentium 133. I don't know any other > network file serving protocol that can do this.
Usually (untuned), you don't get much more on a 100MBit system. If you tune it
(set e.g. rsize/wsize to more reasonable values), you get a speedup to around
3MB/s (at least that's what I experienced), while with FTP you get around
8-9 MB/s. The servers were 4x Xeon with 2GB of RAM and Hardware RAID5, the
clients usually PIII/450.
--
Wastl
*****************************************************************************
* Dipl.Inf. Sebastian Schaffert [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* LFE Programmier- und Modellierungssprachen Raum Z1.01 *
* Institut für Informatik Oettingenstrasse 67 *
* LMU München 80538 München *
*****************************************************************************
PGP Key fingerprint =
13 1D 2E 4F 20 3E C9 1F 4C 57 52 87 8A 80 48 4D F5 E9 97 EC
pgptHxchUxVo9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
