On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > I would like a version of potato that is not entirely frozen. > ... > I am willing to be involved in back-porting packages (there's many > things that I back-port for my own use and should share). > ... > Also we have to consider the long-term view of this. I would > like to see back-ports to woody being done in a year's time...
It's not an easy request to address, really. Opinion is largely subjective as to what one would find valuable for potato, and you run into the problem of making "slushy" potato look more like woody. It's a catch 22 if you take it too far. I think the long view on this subject focuses less on back-ports and more on shorter release cycles. If we can get release cycles for stable down to a year or less, back-ports would simply be less important. So, contribute your efforts to improving and stabilizing woody, so we can get it out the door! ;-) -- Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | a.k.a. ^chewie http://www.wookimus.net/ | s.k.a. gunnarr Key fingerprint = B4AB D627 9CBD 687E 7A31 1950 0CC7 0B18 206C 5AFD
pgpJiiJ72kfIV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
