On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:27:13PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > Is there any reason why libggi2 from unstable is not in testing? All > architectures have now been compiled, being all present and up-to-date in > the pool, but update-excuses gives no hints as to why it hasn't been > accepted in testing. It (update-output) mumbles something incoherent about > the package on alpha, but it's now been built for alpha.
Yup, but the version on alpha depends libc6.1 >= 2.2.3-1 or so, and libc6 2.2.3-1 doesn't build on i386... Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
