Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is likely that the folks who wrote autoconf did not invent this
> idiom for setting and re-setting $IFS. They probably borrowed the
> idea from existing shell code, meaning that the "breakage", as you put
> it, will be widespread indeed.
Please read the code before commenting:
It says:
IFS="${IFS= }"; ac_save_ifs="$IFS"; IFS=":"
If you don't mind me postulating, the first command is actually trying to
assign a default value to IFS if it isn't set. This is actually better
than what Zack Weinberg was trying to do, except that it has an incorrect
default value.
> The autoconf folks try very hard to write portable code. They go to
> ridiculous lengths to support every major flavour of OS, compiler,
> make, and shell. Indeed, Zack's tests show that only the recent ash
> behaves differently.
So what? Broken code is broken code.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
