Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I am suggesting is that katie has a list of such cases (although
> I'm not proposing a particular format):
>From my point of view, such information would ideally be:
o not centrally controlled, but package/maintainer(s) controlled[0]
o trivial (both in terms of code and CPU use) for katie to obtain[1]
o not unnecessarily waste space in places it's not needed[2]
I'd love to see suggestions that satisfy those criteria, but was
eventually someday going to fall back on something like Julian just
suggested if I couldn't find anything better.
--
James
[0] There's already too much centrally controlled information and no
need for this information to be controlled centrally.
[1] Although correctness is far more important for katie than speed,
it is a (minor) issue and katie is already relatively slow.
[2] i.e. not in somewhere like the .dsc file.
