On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:01:16AM +1000, Brian May wrote: ... > I would assume (hope!) the original poster plans to run both power > supplies from the same central switch, in order to minimise problems > here.
OP doesn't plan to run anything. OP informed Powers That Be of the options and is waiting for their decision. :) (the feeling here is that paying more and not having to deal with crappy peecee hardware is a much better option.) As I mentioned before, I don't think load-sharing PSUs are a good idea anyway. Fail-over hot-swappable PSUs, yes; load-sharing -- no. Dima -- E-mail dmaziuk at bmrb dot wisc dot edu (@work) or at crosswinds dot net (@home) http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/descript/gpgkey.dmaziuk.ascii -- GnuPG 1.0.4 public key We're sysadmins. Sanity happens to other people. -- Chris King in asr
