On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:21:28PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:18:42PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > > I can understand why you might say that that's a valid point, but IMHO, we > > shouldn't fuck up current users (by overloading mirrors), just so we can > > support LAZY users to compile something THAT IS NOT EVEN IN DEBIAN. > > Do you actually have any hard facts regarding mirrors broken by kernel > images or do you just like spreading FUD?
ftp.au.d.o and mirror.aarnet.edu.au, the only two Australian Debian mirrors I know, currently have out-of-sync sid Packages and actual packages. Obviously this isn't directly caused by the kernel sources, but the extra load does *not* help one iota. -- Daniel Stone Linux Kernel Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 G!>CS d s++:- a---- C++ ULS++++$>B P---- L+++>++++ E+(joe)>+++ W++ N->++ !o K? w++(--) O---- M- V-- PS+++ PE- Y PGP>++ t--- 5-- X- R- tv-(!) b+++ DI+++ D+ G e->++ h!(+) r+(%) y? UF++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
