On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 11:50:44AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 11:41:56AM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Apr 2001 11:40:15 -0700 "John H. Robinson, IV" wrote: > > > > > however, on something like boot-floppies, this might be a > > > goddess-send. > > > > What about filesystem-level compression? > > http://www.netspace.net.au/~reiter/e2compr/intro.html : > > I wouldn't use e2compr on a ``production'' machine (where > neither faults nor delays are tolerated). >
I would say the same about 2.4 kernel :-) > i would have to say no to that. > > if there were indication that it was ready to stabalize and be ready for > prime time, then add it to unstable and wait for bugreports (make it an > option, of course). I've run it for years (well, almost 2 :-)) on a heavily loaded production server without any problems whatsoever... -- ----------------------------------------------------------- | Radovan Garabik http://melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk/~garabik/ | | __..--^^^--..__ garabik @ melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk | ----------------------------------------------------------- Antivirus alert: file .signature infected by signature virus. Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature file to help me spread!
