Patrick Weemeeuw writes: > I have the feeling that an awful lot of work is being duplicated here.
But then almost the complete work has already been done. > All of the work being done to support shadow password files, will have > to be done over again to support PAM. Also, IMHO the PAM framework is > superior, as it supports shadow password files among others (give or > take maybe a few options particular to the shadow package actually > used). What exactly does it offer that shadow doesn't? Michael -- Michael Meskes | _____ ________ __ ____ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// ____/ // / / __ \___ __________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \__ \/ /_ / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ___/ / __/ /__ __/\__, / __/ / (__ ) Use Debian Linux! | /____/_/ /_/ /____/\___/_/ /____/
