Uploaded to master.debian.org. This is the author's own response to the mount/umount security issues, and so should replace the previous 2.5k-1 release which incorporated unofficial patches.
Bruce, would you like to respond to the recent inquiry about Debian's vulnerability status with regard to mount/umount, mentioning that all versions prior to 2.5k-1 are vulnerable and recommending 2.5l-1 as the official remedy (as soon as it has been placed into the archive)? Or if you'd prefer I prepare something, please let me know. Thanks. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Date: 19 Aug 96 03:23 UT Format: 1.6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: Low Maintainer: Robert Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Source: mount Version: 2.5l-1 Binary: mount Architecture: i386 source Description: mount: Tools for mounting and manipulating filesystems. Changes: * New upstream version. Files: 78dc8abbd116d67f69d5c99e2d1b86bc 53374 base - mount_2.5l-1.tar.gz 1b7cec2510e8470012fb2c9a1a3f5e92 3116 base - mount_2.5l-1.diff.gz 6672530030f9a6c42451ace74c7510ca 41470 base required mount_2.5l-1_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQB1AwUBMhfeSwfFLymttX8tAQHb+QL5Af1sJcbUh/9Sp2DDCf2RPxZQMT8yGBcv lHV7GofgbLMsL/K26dGGeAs8g5AazVG31goeF6o2l/Bu7gJxLkK6RplLeMCVCSqc 9eQsuoodyyttWGbdnvPceoDODmrv3PKZ =ablG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Robert Leslie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
