On 8 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > The short answer is exactly what you should expect - No, > > absolutely not. Any emergence of a general rsync for APT > > Then why did it take so long? :)
I was traveling. > > method will result in the immediate termination of public rsync > > access to our servers. > > I think that is something to be discussed. As I said before, I expect > the rsync + some features to produce less load than ftp or http. No. If this comes about the load will go up, our mirrors will have trouble getting access and I then will disable it. > Given that it doesn't need more resources than those two, is the > answere still no? Yes. I cannot create more rsync slots because those slots can just as easially be used for more intensive operations. > again. I hope I got an url for it by then. Check sourceforge. Jason
