[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes: > As opposed to the current scheme, which also requires "annoying manual > editing of addresses" to reply to the list, if your mailreader does the > reasonable thing and assumes you want to reply to the original sender of > the message, in liu of a reply-to header.
Only if you're using a MUA too old or disfunctional to be worth discussing. All reasonable mail readers support at least `reply to sender' and `followup'/`wide-reply' commands, and the latter should do what you want. By making Reply-To: point to the list, you make these two different commands do the same thing, thus depriving the user of the choice. -Miles -- Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over, pinning you underneath. At night the ice weasels come. --Nietzsche
