Hello,
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 07:49:55PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:42:22AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Ack!(tm). Not shades of rh7, I hope? I know that people using sid (like > Uh, GCC 2.95.3 CVS NOT 2.96 OR 2.97! Please be careful what you say. We > are talking about a stable release here, not a dripping wet development > snapshot. fwiw, people I also trust to know what they are doing are shipping GCC 2.95.3 as their default C compiler _now_ ... in OpenBSD 2.8. This discussion has happened over there, too, and also led to the same clarification... rh7 apparently shipped some 2.96 beta. Best Regards, --Toni++
