On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:42:25PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > AFAIK there is a problem with this patch since some of the copyright > > messages of the drivers are not displayed anymore. since some of them > > require the Copyright announcement, this is a violation of the license. As > > far as I know that was the reason for not putting that patch into the > > kernel, long ago. > > Can you show me an example of such a license?
And not to be pedantic or anything, but how are these Copyright announcements handled on a machine that boots headless? I would think that would be just the same violation of the license. -- Ferret Who recalls a cddb access program designed for blind people where cddb.com DENIED a certification because the program couldn't display a graphical logo where the blind people could see it.
