You (Bruce Perens) wrote: > > Umm, "non-free to distribute" shouldn't be on /any/ ftp site, right? > > No, there are too many shades of this. Ask Dale about the new Pine/Pico > license.
Also, while on the subject, should "non-free" be renamed to "buzz-nonfree" or "rex-nonfree" and frozen at the release, just like the "normal distribution? The same for contrib, ofcourse. Uhm and what about non-free-stable, non-free-unstable, contrib-stable etc symlinks? Perhaps the non-free directory should be moved into "rex" so that is is part of the distribution itself wrt release engineering etc? Mike. -- Miquel van | Cistron Internet Services -- Alphen aan den Rijn. Smoorenburg, | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cistron.nl/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Tel: +31-172-419445 (Voice) 430979 (Fax) 442580 (Data)
