On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 04:06:49PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > > packages into unstable. Helix is too stable for unstable, and too unstable > > for stable. > > Not exactly true, as Helix Gnome is usually more cutting-edge than > unstable Gnome.
In my experience, it's had a bug report to fix turnaround time of a under a day if you can give a complete and reproducable problem. That's pretty good for any problem, even trivial ones can't be expected to get fixed in a matter of a few hours like I've seen with Helix Gnome. Software has bugs, it's a fact of life. New software is more likely to have unknown bugs that affect more people. What makes the Helix packages so nice is the turnaround time for fixes. I don't know how they do it, but they do. -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3 Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3 <kceee^> I hate users <knghtbrd> you sound like a sysadmin already! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
