On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:49:27PM -0700, Michael Meskes wrote: > > Could anyone please explain this to me? Did Corel do anything to their files > > that makes apt think it has to upgrade although its up-to-date? Or is this > > a bug in apt? > > I see this quite often, so it is a bug in the curret apt lib. aptitude is > even more vulnerable to this... at least the cache does work so u d/l it > only once.
Yes, I saw something similar in today's upgrade session.. I'll have a look
next time around.
--
Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONNECT 300... Connect 300?!?!?! #%^# NO CARRIER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian GNU/Linux.... Ooohh You are missing out!
pgpq4g8QsB1w7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
