>>"Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> Well, IMO, anything that goes on the Debian website better be
Ben> created by free software. No offense, but if I start seeing
Ben> "Made with Macromedia" or "Designed with Photoshop" on the
Ben> website, there will be hell to pay :)
Conversly, if the output is pristine HTML, I see no reason to
refuse it.
Ben> There are several criteria for the website, unspoken, but surely everyone
Ben> knows this:
Ben> a) It needs to be browsable by text-only browsers without going through
Ben> some "click here for cheezy text only site".
Ben> b) Graphics need to be created in Gimp (is there any other free graphics
Ben> program around worth its salt?).
Ben> c) Geared towards informational and structural concerns rather than "eye
Ben> candy".
Ben> When I go to the Debian webpage, I want answers and information, and I
Ben> think most people feel the same way.
You can create lousy, unhelpful HTML with the freest of tools,
Emacs. ANd you can create helpful content, WAP and cell phone
accesible not graphical pure HTML pages with a proprietary editor.
Lets not get overtly political and start refusing offers of
help in good faith, shall we? God, this is a far cry from the early
days of the FSF.
manoj
--
"The Berlin Wall is the defining achievement of socialism." George
Will
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
