I've heard other reports of UMSDOS interacting badly with W95's long filename stuff. I'd put it down as a `backup first' thing for now - though I don't use either of them.
> umsdos with windows '95 filesystem might be a problem... With > linux's msdos-fs I were not able to delete a directory; only got > 'directory is not empty'-message even the directory were empty. > >Are you sure this is because of w95? > >You can also get a directory into this state using a vanilla dos file >system. Umsdos has some race conditions in it that can fail to >remove some of the guts of links -- these will prevent the directory >from being removed until the directory has been cleaned up >(e.g. mount it as an msdos file system, then use rm -rf). -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/
