On Sun, 17 Dec 1995, Ian Murdock wrote: > Well, we appear to have two options. We can (1) leave the development > release in an unreadable directory, as it is at present; or (2) move the > development release back into a readable directory, making it clear that > it's still under development.
Am I that confused. I thoght that the release presently reachable through ftp.debian.org:/debian/development was the development release. > Personally, I prefer (2). [...] Me too. > I think using a code name for the release is the best idea; I'll leave > thinking of one to the creative element of the Debian Project. :) I think "development" is a fine name for it.
