Fernando Alegre writes: >I think my suggestion still fits very well within your scheme. Look below:
>> 0.93R6 -> Highgate >> Highgate/ [contains 0.93R6] > >Why not having another symlink: > not-released-1.0 -> Holborn Yup, that'd be good. >That way we would just change the name of the symlink from >not-released-1.0 to release-1.0, while the actual directory would be the >same. This seems to be one of the more important things. -- Richard Kettlewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elmail.co.uk/staff/richard/
