Jeff Noxon writes: > My plan is to rewrite run-parts in C or C++. However, I probably won't > have that done until next weekend. I've never done any perl programming > before, so i'd like to avoid making changes to the perl script unless > you think this bug is urgent enough to warrant it.
No, fine. > This still doesn't resolve the problem with --test listing scripts without > "#!". Any clever solutions to that one? :) Yes. Have run-parts --test list the script and then when you run it for real produce a message saying `failed to execute such-and-such, Exec format error'. This is analogous to what it should do if the #! line lists a missing interpreter, or the executable format isn't supported by the kernel, or something similar. Ian.
