On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 10:07:25AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > If one changes the architecture of a package from "any" to "all" but > > makes no change to the package name, does this require any special > > manual intervention, or would an upload that makes such a change go > > through as quickly as a normal upload would go through? Hypothetical > > situation: a compiled executable gets replaced with a shell script. > > Not so hypothetical: I've done this with netenv, which compiled a small > executable from C code just because the upstream author didn't know how > to do bitwise calculations in bash; I replaced the calls to that execu- > table by > > let R1=$((~N1 & 255 | I1)) > let R2=$((~N2 & 255 | I2)) > > and similar, and *woosh* it was Architecture: all.
Skip the let, and *woosh*, it's even POSIX compliant shell script... =) Regards: David -- /) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Northern lights wander (\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
