Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:Travis Crump wrote:Isn't that necessarily chronological order?The changelog should be in the order changes were made.Should changelogs be in chronological order or should they be in version number order?
Not if you're merging two branches, and reusing the changelogs to describe the (merged) changes.
Well, you could still call that chronological order, but the chronology wouldn't necessarily match the dates listed in the changelog.
Cheers, aj
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]