On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:59:13 +0100 Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, more importantly, this is archive bloat. Since apparantly the > lopster maintainer is not upgrading his package, you intend to just > add the new version to the archive, in stead of doing something about > the original issue? for now lopster2 in't usuable. looks fine but.. i think to adopt and maintain lopster until a usable lopster2 version comes out then i will ask for remove it. > I don't think it's okay even with maintainer permission unless there > is a very good reason to have multiple versions of a certain package > in the archive, something that is relatively rare. i agree with you. -- ciao giskard A lavorare ci puo` pensare chi non ha voglia di vivere; per gente veramente consapevole esistono solo due possibilita`: artista o criminale.
pgpLuxo6eLnil.pgp
Description: PGP signature
