Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 11:58 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 08:41:31 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I uploaded some mutter fixes to unstable after the buster release > > which > > I think would be worth considering for a buster update - perhaps > > for > > 10.2 rather than 10.1 at this point. > > On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 08:44:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I uploaded some GNOME Shell fixes to unstable after the buster > > release > > which I think would be worth considering for a buster update - > > perhaps > > for 10.2 rather than 10.1 at this point. > > The GNOME team is starting to upload GNOME 3.34 to unstable, so these > 3.30.x updates have had as much testing in testing/unstable as they > are > going to get. I haven't seen any regression reports, either from > testing/unstable users or after asking stable users to test a > prerelease. > > Do these changes seem OK to upload to proposed-updates now > that 10.1 is out? Early in the cycle is probably a good time, > to get as much opportunity as possible for people to try them via > proposed-updates. Please let me know if any of the upstream fixes are > considered too intrusive and need to be reverted.
Please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam
