Le jeudi 10 novembre 2016, 10:27:26 CET Eric Valette a écrit :
> On 11/09/2016 10:53 PM, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
> > control: tags -1 pending
> >
> > Le mercredi 9 novembre 2016, 22:45:32 CET Eric Valette a écrit :
> >> the wrong code is calling "which update-initramfs" outside of if
> >> because then the set -e catch an error and there is no way the
> >> test on $? can work
> >>
> >> correct code is:
> >>
> >> if which update-initramfs > /dev/null; then
> >> update-initramfs -u
> >> fi
> >
> > Yes, was preparing that already after reading your last mail. :-)
> >
> > It’s now committed to SVN and will be in the next upload.
>
>
> While you are at it, maybe it is time to replace update-grub2 by
> update-grub because the move is complete even for jessie...
Committed, thanks.
@all, in postinst I see that update-grub is called with
update-grub || true
to ensure package installation succeeds even if it returns an error.
Shouldn't we do the same with update-initramfs -u ?
Currently it's called as is so if returns non-zero it'll break package install
like #843727 due to set -e.
Thanks,
--Aurélien
