Control: severity -1 normal Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi,
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 12:24:47PM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > I thing that when someone tries to "sell" it's product > it should at least eat it's own dog food. > > On a more practical note, this is a native package. Thanks for your replies. I think this is a more special case than others. I do not expect any of the instances that Paul mentioned to actually run the packaged debbugs and instead expect all of them to run from a git checkout. As such the package probably is useless and removing it still seems like the right action to me. > The bugs belong here, if package is RM'ed > all theses bugs will be automatically closed. > > Where should else they go ? This is a valid question and I have no good answer. Before proceeding to remove the actual package, we should have an answer. Hence, I am lowering the severity and that'll prevent the autoremover from taking further action. I still hope that the situation can be improved by bringing the actual package into better shape or finding a different place for the bug reports. However that may turn out, I agree that removing the package has more downsides than benefits at this time. Helmut
