On Fri, 07 Dec 2018, Bastian Venthur wrote: > Good to hear! To start it off, I've created a swagger spec that is faithful > to the current setup: > > https://github.com/venthur/debbugs-proposal/blob/master/yaml-unresolved/swagger.yaml
[...] > If you want to take over the repo as owner, that's fine with me. I can also > manually merge the current best version to `master` and others make PRs > against that branch, I don't really mind. That works for me for starters. I'm happy to make any changes to the API that make sense to you; I'm totally not wedded to what is currently returned by the current API either. > As next steps I propose to improve the `Status` data type (i.e. the return > value of the former `get_status`: > > * do we really need all fields? > * the `done` field is currently a maintainer or empty if not closed, > maybe we can introduce `status` with the possible states: `open`, > `pending`, `closed`, `archived` and introduce an optional `closed_by`: > <maintaine>, this way we could also get rid of `archived`, > `pending` and `unarchived` What you're looking for is this 'pending' field, which has that information. The 'archived' and 'unarchived' fields tell you whether a bug is archived, and when a bug has been unarchived previously. [The documentation in Debbugs::Status has more of this detail.] -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com 6: If we are one, then we can defeat 2. -- "The Prisoner (2009 Miniseries)" _Schizoid_
