On Sun, 2016-09-04 16:44 -0700, Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, 04 Sep 2016, Ben Finney wrote: > > The ‘debbugs’ server has evidently retrieved a completely different > > text, some “Received” field from the message header. This fails to > > meet the behaviour described in the documentation.
On reflection, perhaps this is because ‘debbugs’ is sending a new message to itself (in response to the “Control” field in the pseudo-header), and *that* message is what it expects to have the summary paragraph. When in fact, the summary paragraph is in the message to the bug report address, the one which contained the “Control” field. > Hrm; yeah, that was working in the past, and what you saw now is > definitely a bug. Thanks for reporting it! Hope this helps. -- \ `\ _o__) Ben Finney <bign...@debian.org>
