I'd like to release debbugs 2.4.1 to unstable soon, i.e. this week. Does anyone have any objections? (Adam and I agreed that the new .status format should wait for the next version, I think.) Naturally I'll give the indexing and CGI scripts a workout before I do so, since one of the points of getting this into unstable is to finally have a version where the CGI scripts work out of the box. We may then want to drop the static HTML building scripts after sarge is released.
The full disclosure part is that I've recently started working for nCipher, and I've been asked to spend a small part of my time upgrading their debbugs installation, I hope to 2.4.1. It's possible that I may end up doing some generally-applicable bits and pieces to debbugs on work time, although I don't expect a great deal along those lines. In case that happens, I've made sure to get it in writing that it's OK for me to contribute the odd bit of code to debbugs from work as long as I update the copyright notice, so if you see the years against nCipher's name in the existing notice changing then that's why. :-) -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
