On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:29:33 +0530 Pirate Praveen
<prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 00:01:01 +0530 Pirate Praveen
<prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:
> > * asking the maintainers of the Ruby libraries that ruby-task-list
> > recursively depends on (such as ruby-rack) to remove *their*
> dependencies
Looking at ruby-rack now, it ships /usr/bin/rackup executable. So it
looks like a new binary package rackup needs to be created in this case
if I understood the decision correctly. Or can this be considered a
non-userfacing executable? I don't know if any package use rack directly.
Fortunately, ruby-task-list dropped dependency on ruby-rack from version
2 and ruby-activesupport and ruby-nokogiri is only required for older
versions of ruby. So we will just need to take care of
ruby-html-pipeline and we can remove the other dependencies.
