On Thu, 03 Nov 2016, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Thu, 03 Nov 2016, Paul Wise wrote: > > Debian often wants to have informal votes (team meeting dates for eg). > > I was thinking it would be useful to have pocket-devotee/devotee more > > widely available, perhaps by packaging them in the Debian archive. > > > > I wonder about the correct approach here, should pocket-devotee be > > merged back into devotee and then devotee be packaged for Debian? > > Or just merge pocket-devotee into devscripts and leave devotee out? > > I basically forked pocket-devotee right out of devotee for CTTE use, but > I'm totally OK with it being shoved into devscripts and sending patches > there to maintain it if that's OK with secretary@.
Manoj and Kurt: do you have any problems with me submitting pocket-devotee as a patch to devscripts? If not, I'll try to get to that when I have a moment next week. -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com An elephant: A mouse built to government specifications. -- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p244
