❦ 23 octobre 2016 19:53 +1030, Ron <r...@debian.org> : >> So, nothing will move on your side until I bring some proof that "nobody >> is interested in htags". Well, I won't bring any such proof either. > > That was a claim _you_ made in bringing this to the TC. Are you really > saying now that you have no basis at all for making it?
There are several people (15 of them) in both bug reports asking for a
new upstream release. None of them said they were using the CGI
stuff.
>> Your mail should show the TC you don't intend on bringing any solution
>> other than the status quo.
>
> That isn't what I said at all. What I'm saying is that there is no way
> we can avoid _some_ potential user not losing here, whatever we do.
> That's just a plain and simple and awful fact of the situation.
>
> So if you don't want to be the one who loses from whatever consensus
> we do arrive at as the best of a bunch of bad options, you're probably
> going to need to present a slightly more compelling argument than
> "I can't be bothered doing any work to help decide what's really best".
>
> Trying to play procedural games and hoping that luck might fall your
> way because you threw the dice is really not very helpful for making
> a good technical decision here.
>
> I'm appalled at the status quo. My concern is that we don't make
> that even worse with uninformed decisions. In the absence of good
> information, sometimes the best thing to do is be patient until
> more of it arrives. But I'm happy to talk it out here and see if we
> can arrive at some informed consensus, even if it's only so that we
> can have some more independent and objective input to put an end to
> the "ooh, that nasty maintainer won't do what I want" side of it.
Let's see what the TC thinks. I don't have more arguments to bring to
this debate.
--
When one burns one's bridges, what a very nice fire it makes.
-- Dylan Thomas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
