Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au> writes: > It's really pretty terrible to actively use FD to try to block options > that aren't your favourite. Honestly, I would have expected the tech > ctte to be able to come to a consensus on a set of proposals considered > reasonable by all the members, and accept whatever a majority > decided. I'd certainly hope that tech ctte members won't tactically > change their vote to try to hack the process.
> (The obvious counter is for the four members who prefer T to L to vote > all the L options below FD in the same way as Andi, Ian and Steve have > voted all the T options below FD) Exactly. I've been trying to refrain from tactical voting of that sort. I don't think that's a slippery slope we should start diving down. I also flatly disagree with Adrian over whether we're deadlocked. I don't see any point in discussing it, though. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fvnvlomo....@windlord.stanford.edu
