On 6 February 2014 16:27, Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au> wrote: > Rankings between remaning actual outcomes is: > 4x UL > DL > UT > DT (steve, colin, ian, andi) > 2x DT > DL > UT > UL (russ, don)
Ah! I thought there was something to add here The above votes divide neatly into upstart v systemd camps. Given Bdale and Keith have expressed a preference for systemd previously, presumably they fall onto the systemd side; so will vote presumably vote either DT or DL above the other options, and will vote DL > UL, and DT > UT. In that case, DL > UT 6:2, 7:1 or 8:0 DL >= DT 6:2, 5:3 or 4:4 UL >= UT 6:2, 5:3 or 4:4 UL >= DT 6:2, 5:3 or 4:4 DT = UT 4:4 DL = UL 4:4 UT would thus have no chance of being in the Schwartz set (it doesn't beat anything, and is beaten by DL). Possible outcomes are then: DL >= DT 6:2, 5:3 or 4:4 UL >= DT 6:2, 5:3 or 4:4 DL = UL 4:4 ie: - if either Bdale or Keith vote DT below UL or DL, DT loses, and the result is determined by Bdale's casting vote between UL and DL - otherwise, the result is determined by Bdale's casting vote amongst UL, DL and DT Also, Russ correctly points out: > > DL > GR 6:0 > For whatever it's worth, I think this line is wrong. I voted GR above DL. Hopefully there wasn't much else wrong with the analysis. (Having 10 options on a vote that's supposed to have its results tallied by hand seems nuts to me...) Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cajs_lcvgqenurnnuzffvwfw29wvadt3su1wveabffnwc-l2...@mail.gmail.com
