On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > So let me expand on that a little. Image the following options > - A: something that doesn't overrule the ctte (1:1) > - B: something that does overrule the ctte (2:1) > - FD
In this case, I don't know A could be anything but 2:1, baring riders from the CTTE. If A is technical, it needs the power of the CTTE under §4.1.4 which requires 2:1. [I suppose something could be written which would fall under the DPL's remit.] As I understand it, we'd like to make everything be 1:1, and the method we're trying is to write a proposal in such a way that it automatically enshrouds a non-technical statement by the project in the power of the CTTE. It may be that we can't actually do that, and should instead just have an agreement between CTTE members to enact a decision which followed a position statement GR under §4.1.5. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com Maybe I did steal your heart and I am such a perfect criminal that you never noticed -- a softer world #481 http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=481 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140206004854.gd5...@teltox.donarmstrong.com
