Adrian Bunk <b...@stusta.de> writes: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:27:53AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I'm still wondering if maybe there's just a communication failure here, so >> let me try one more round. >> My understanding of what Josselin is saying is that GNOME's ConsoleKit >> support is effectively unmaintained and unsupported upstream, as is >> ConsoleKit itself. The consequences of that are starting to show in a >> variety of unfixed bugs. >>... > No, Josselin was making the technical claim that GNOME 3.10 would need a > working logind even for basic functionality. > So if it is possible to get the basic functionality of GNOME 3.10 > without a working logind, his claim is just plain wrong. > And when I was asking him for the technical details that would back up > such a strong claim, he was not able to deliver. He delivered exactly what you asked for, and you then deleted his response and claimed he didn't provide it. Then you did the same thing to me. It looks like Josselin's response to you was the correct one, and I will now follow his lead, do what I should have done a while back, and stop responding to your email messages on this topic, since I don't believe you're discussing in good faith. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vbx233ou....@windlord.stanford.edu
