On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Michael Gilbert dixit: > >>Why not avoid impeding progress and just let gnome do what it needs to >>work the way it wants, which would involve depending on the right > > Excuse me, why is GNOME, specifically, being allowed to “do what it > wants”, in this case?
gnome is simply an example, which makes sense to talk about given its apparent direction toward being systemd-only. Why exactly would it be harmful for the gnome island to be a systemd world? > Imagine other software with a more-or-less legitimate dependency on, meh idk, > upstart for example. I don't see any problem with that either. If someone were interested in creating "upstartwm", why get in their way? Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mp2aomq2hgj0ys+cko7jxp357y13mzuttq3nf81ztp...@mail.gmail.com
