On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Because it performs worse, which makes it less used in general, which > makes it less tested, which makes it less trustworthy. I thought that > was already clarified at bug#679665. Does it make sense now?
Thanks, yes. > It is helpful that you introduce _different_ approaches if you have > ideas you think might be better, but less helpful to repost existing > ones rephrased. Oh, sorry. I thought I had read through the bugreports, but apparently didn’t see the connection. bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-314 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Boris Esser, Sebastian Mancke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1207110921370.8...@tglase.lan.tarent.de