On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

> Because it performs worse, which makes it less used in general, which 
> makes it less tested, which makes it less trustworthy.  I thought that 
> was already clarified at bug#679665.  Does it make sense now?

Thanks, yes.

> It is helpful that you introduce _different_ approaches if you have 
> ideas you think might be better, but less helpful to repost existing 
> ones rephrased.

Oh, sorry. I thought I had read through the bugreports, but apparently
didn’t see the connection.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-314
HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
Geschäftsführer: Boris Esser, Sebastian Mancke



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1207110921370.8...@tglase.lan.tarent.de

Reply via email to