Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Draft GR for supermajority fix"):
> I'm trying to think of a situation where you'd want m != 1 and where
> there would be an intuitively reasonable understanding of what was
> intended.It would be perfectly plausible for some particular thing to need a ratio of 3:2. That's a clearer way to express it IMO than 1.5:1. > Absent that, I think it's more important that things be clear and easier > to understand than that they work for m != 1. If this is a problem we can leave it. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20475.6842.686277.954...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
