Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: Draft GR for advice re overruling"):
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:11:22AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > In the past the Technical Committee have been slow and reluctant
> ^^^^
> [...]
> > ----- GENERAL RESOLUTION OPTION A -----
> >
> > The Technical Committee's approach so far has been correct.
>
> What's the point of mentioning "slow" above? I don't think anyone wants
> the tech-ctte (or any other Debian body, fwiw) to be slow on purpose.
> That might come as a consequence of something else (e.g. reluctance),
> but then you should ask for advice on that rather than on slowness.
>
> Suggestion: drop "slow and".
Done in my draft.
Thanks,
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20475.6119.144770.632...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
