Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes: > Based on Ian's last response, I think the ballot has two options plus > further discussion, since I'm quite sure that we're not going to outlaw > dh:
> A. debian/rules is not required to be a makefile, only to implement the > same interface as a debian/rules file implemented as a makefile > (including handling of arguments and exit status). Debian Policy > should be updated to change the requirement to a recommendation, and > new versions of the leave package should be permitted to be uploaded to > the archive without changing debian/rules to be a makefile. > B. The Technical Committee affirms the Debian Policy requirement that > debian/rules must be a makefile. All packages in the archive, > including leave, are required to follow this requirement. This > makefile may, as is common practice, delegate implementation of its > targets to a script. > C. Further discussion. Reminder: there is a vote currently in progress on this ballot. So far, only Ian and I have voted. Please take a look at the cited bug and register an opinion when you have a chance. Per 6.3.1 of the Constitution, our voting period is one week, which means that votes have to be sent by Wednesday (2012-03-28). -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
