Ian Jackson writes ("Call for Votes (getaddrinfo)"):
> -8<-
>
> 1. RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not be applied to IPv4 addresses
> by Debian systems, and we DO overrule the maintainer.
> 2. RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not be applied to IPv6 addresses
> by Debian systems. We do NOT overrule the maintainer.
> 3. We recommend to the IETF that RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should be
> abolished for IPv4, and that it should be reconsidered for IPv6.
>
> -8<-
>
> [ ] Choice X: Do not use rule 9, overrule maintainer, etc., as above.
> [ ] Choice S: Sort IPv4 addrs according to rule 9 in getaddrinfo
> [ ] Choice M: Leave the choice up to the maintainers.
> [ ] Choice F: Further discussion
The following people appear to me to have voted as follows, within the
7-day period, which has just expired:
X F S M Ian, Manoj
X F M S Andi
M F AJ
F defeats S by 4:0, so S is eliminated.
F defeats M by 3:1, so M is eliminated.
The remaining non-default option is X. It has a 3:1 supermajority
requirement. X defeats F by 3:1, which is exactly sufficient.
Thus X wins and the resolution between -8<- above has been passed,
overruling the maintainer.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
