Anthony Towns writes ("Re: Call for Votes (getaddrinfo)"):
> Again, if we don't think this bug is severe enough to need to be fixed
> in stable (and thus qualifies as RC), I don't think we should be overruling
> the maintainer.If you think that RCness (or desire to fix in stable) is relevant, surely the question is whether _you_ think this bug is severe enough to be RC ? Personally I think the bug ought to be fixed in stable, as I've said. Would you vote in favour of a resolution which insisted on pushing the change to stable, would you vote in favour ? I think not. So it's a red herring. > If Josip's correct in saying that this is screwing over the Debian > apt round-robin hosts, it seems like we should be saying this is RC, but > nobody seemed willing to do that when I brought it up earlier. I think that it will be easier to convince people to push it into stable after we've demonstrated that it works well in testing. If you think it's a release-critical bug and that it ought to be changed in stable, surely you should vote in favour of my resolution as a step towards that goal ? Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
