On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:58:57AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > "Every package in contrib must comply with the DFSG ... Examples of > packages which would be included in contrib are: ... wrapper packages > or other sorts of free accessories for non-free programs." > It seems clear to me that ndiswrapper fits this policy rather exactly.
I disagree with you on that -- I still think "providing a compatable interface"
is the best way to look at this, as per:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2006/03/msg00037.html
> So, I'd like to propose that we issue an opinion that ndiswrapper
> needs to be in contrib, to comply with debian policy.
As per http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2006/03/msg00130.html I think
you should draft up your proposal and we should just have a vote already.
Cheers,
aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
