* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060605 07:31]: > The resolution is still in order, though.
Ok, than we should just proceed, I think. :) > > WHEREAS > > > 1. Sven Luther complains that he has been deprived of commit access to > > debian-installer's svn repository after he stepped back as installer > > powerpc maintainer. > > > 2. The Debian Project Leader has decided to uphold this particular > > decision of the debian-installer project head.[1] > > > 3. Access controls to source code repositories are not something in the > > regular domain of the Technical Committee. However, in this case the > > decision was delegated by the Project Leader to the Technical > > Committee as appeal instance of the Project Leader's decision. > > suggest striking this and renumbering paragraph 4 as 3. anything else except the renumbering? > > > 4. Cooperation between Sven Luther and the installer team can also > > happen via patches sent to the bug tracking system. > > > THE COMMITTEE CONCLUDES > > > 1. The decision of the installer project head and the Project Leader is > > upheld by the Committee. > > > 2. We recommend the involved parties to work as suggessted by the > > Project Leader.[1] > > Suggest the following: > > THE COMMITTEE: > > 1. UPHOLDS the decision of the leader of the installer project and the > Project Leader. > > 2. RECOMMENDS that the involved parties proceed as suggested by the Project > Leader.[1] Yes, that sounds good. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
